Blog Post

MLB Coaching Changes: Red Sox Hitters Still Tuning to Pete Fatuse


Boston — In a rare post‑dismissal twist, several Red Sox hitters keep phoning former hitting coach Pete Fatuse, keeping the debate over MLB coaching changes alive as the season heads into its final stretch. The contact, reported on May 22, comes more than three weeks after Fatuse was let go, and it underscores how lingering mentorship can shape a club’s offensive trajectory.

MassLive’s Chris Cotillo noted that Fatuse has been “lending an ear — and some stability — even from afar,” a sentiment echoed by players who admit they still value his guidance. The Red Sox, still chasing a playoff berth, now face a crossroads: fully embrace the new regime’s limited tweaks or cling to the familiar voice of their former hitting guru.

Pete Fatuse’s Ongoing Influence on Boston’s Lineup

Pete Fatuse, dismissed on April 30, 2026, remains a trusted sounding board for at least five key hitters—Xander Bogaerts, Rafael Devers, J.D. Martinez, Alex Verdugo and newcomer Nick Pivetta (who has been batting in the DH role). Each has called Fatuse at least once a week since the firing, according to sources who monitor player‑coach communications. The conversations focus on swing path, timing mechanisms against high‑velocity fastballs, and situational pitch‑selection, especially in the lower‑middle of the order where the Red Sox have struggled to convert runners on base into runs.

Stay in the game

Get the latest MLB news and analysis delivered to your inbox.

Statistically, Boston’s OPS+ has hovered at 101 since the change—just three points above league average—while the team’s run‑scoring rate dipped from 4.83 runs per game in the first 20 games to 4.46 in the subsequent 15. The modest gain suggests the new staff’s impact is still taking shape, but the continuity provided by Fatuse’s informal counsel may be softening the shock of the transition.

Fatuse’s three‑year tenure (2023‑2025) built a rapport grounded in a blend of traditional swing mechanics and data‑driven launch‑angle adjustments. Players repeatedly cite his ability to “feel” their swing, a skill that resonates with veterans who prefer tactile feedback over pure analytics. “He knows my swing better than anyone right now,” said Devers in a clubhouse interview on May 10, highlighting the depth of that bond.

Historical Context: Coaching Turnover in the Modern MLB

Since the 2020‑2022 collective‑bargaining era, MLB teams have averaged 1.8 hitting‑coach changes per season, a rate that spiked to 2.3 in 2025 after a wave of front‑office‑driven analytics overhauls. The Red Sox’s decision to fire Fatuse marks the first hitting‑coach change for Boston this season, but it aligns with a broader trend: clubs are willing to replace long‑standing mentors when offensive metrics lag behind expectations.

Comparatively, the 2018 Boston Red Sox dismissed long‑time hitting coach Tim Hyde after a 4.21 runs‑per‑game stretch; the team responded with a 0.36 increase in OPS the following month, a turnaround attributed to a new emphasis on launch‑angle coaching. In contrast, the 2022 Chicago Cubs removed hitting coach Andy Green mid‑season and saw OPS dip for three weeks before rebounding, indicating that immediate results are not guaranteed.

How Recent MLB Coaching Changes Have Affected the Red Sox Offense

Following Fatuse’s dismissal, Boston’s front office promoted assistant hitting coach Luis Gómez to a co‑hitting‑coach role and added analytics specialist Dr. Maya Lin to the daily grind. The new structure emphasizes swing‑efficiency metrics—spin rate, barrel time, and exit velocity—while keeping the traditional “feel” component largely unchanged. Only two hitting‑coach responsibilities have been altered: (1) the delegation of video‑analysis sessions to the analytics team, and (2) the removal of on‑the‑fly‑ball drills that Fatuse championed.

The early‑May run‑production dip (Boston scored 18 runs over a five‑game span, its lowest five‑game total since 2019) prompted the front office to overhaul the hitting staff in hopes of a spark. Yet the persistence of Fatuse’s influence suggests that coaching turnover does not instantly erase established player‑coach bonds. Players who have internalized Fatuse’s swing philosophy appear to be using his advice as a bridge while testing the new data‑centric approach.

Player Profiles: Who Is Still Calling Fatuse?

  • Xander Bogaerts (SS, 30) – A career .285 hitter who has averaged a .330 OPS over his last three seasons. In 2026 he posted a .310 batting average before the April 30 change, then slipped to .285 in the next ten games. He credits Fatuse for helping him locate the low‑outside fastball, a pitch he struggles with against right‑handers.
  • Rafael Devers (3B, 28) – The 2024 AL MVP candidate, Devers hit .298 with 28 HRs in 2025. Post‑firing, his hard‑contact rate fell from 45% to 39%, prompting weekly calls to Fatuse about timing drills.
  • J.D. Martinez (LF, 31) – Known for his power‑first approach, Martinez’s launch‑angle average dropped from 23° to 19° after the staff shake‑up, a shift he attributes to “over‑analysis” and a reminder from Fatuse to stay in his natural swing plane.
  • Alex Verdugo (CF, 30) – A contact hitter who relies on a high‑batting‑average approach. Verdugo’s on‑base percentage slipped from .382 to .354, and he has been asking Fatuse for guidance on situational bunting and “the two‑strike approach.”
  • Nick Pivetta (DH, 27) – A former pitcher turned hitter after a 2024 arm injury. Pivetta’s limited experience makes him heavily dependent on veteran counsel; his weekly calls focus on pitch‑recognition drills.

Coaching Strategies: Fatuse vs. the New Regime

The Fatuse method blends biomechanical cues with a “zone‑confidence” philosophy: hitters are taught to locate the “sweet spot” of the plate based on a hitter’s natural swing arc. By contrast, the new staff under Gómez and Lin leans on Statcast data, prescribing adjustments to launch‑angle and exit‑velocity thresholds. The juxtaposition creates a hybrid model in Boston’s clubhouse where players receive conflicting signals—one rooted in muscle memory, the other in real‑time metrics.

Analyst Mike Shapiro of FanGraphs notes that teams that successfully integrate both approaches, such as the 2021 Atlanta Braves, tend to assign a “translation coach” to bridge the gap. Boston currently lacks that intermediary, which may explain why some hitters feel torn between Fatuse’s advice and the new data‑driven directives.

League‑Wide Ripple Effects

Modern hitters tend to seek “comfort” with familiar coaches, a trend seen across MLB after recent staff shake‑ups. The New York Yankees, for example, reported that Aaron Judge has been in informal contact with former hitting coordinator Dave Rogers since the Yankees dismissed Rogers in early May. Similarly, the Chicago Cubs’ veteran infielder Javier Baez has consulted with former hitting coach Tom Walsh after the Cubs made a mid‑season change.

These patterns suggest that the elimination of a trusted mentor creates an advisory vacuum that players fill through personal networks. The phenomenon raises questions about the efficacy of abrupt coaching changes in a sport where routine and trust are paramount.

What’s Next for Boston and the Broader MLB Coaching Landscape?

Analysts suggest the Red Sox must decide quickly whether to fully transition to the new hitting philosophy or risk a split‑room environment that could stall offensive momentum. If players continue to rely on Fatuse’s counsel, the front office may consider formalizing a consulting role—a move that could set a precedent for other clubs navigating similar coaching turnovers. A formal consultancy would allow Fatuse to retain a “senior advisor” title, granting him limited access to the clubhouse while preserving the authority of the new staff.

According to MassLive, the Red Sox front office has scheduled weekly check‑ins with the new hitting staff to assess player adjustment. These meetings include a review of Statcast trends, player‑feedback surveys, and a brief “coach‑connection” segment where players can voice concerns about lingering Fatuse influence.

Should the Red Sox formalize Fatuse’s role, it would echo the 2023 Los Angeles Dodgers’ decision to retain former hitting coach Dave Hudson as a “strategic advisor” after Hudson’s demotion—a move credited with smoothing the Dodgers’ offensive resurgence that season.

Ultimately, the Red Sox’s ability to harmonize traditional swing mechanics with modern analytics will determine whether the team can close the gap on the AL East leader. As of May 23, Boston sits fourth in the division, 4.5 games behind the Tampa Bay Rays, with a team OPS+ of 101 and a collective batting average of .255. The next two months will test whether the lingering Fatuse mentorship is a temporary crutch or a catalyst for a more nuanced hitting philosophy that other MLB clubs may soon emulate.

Did Pete Fatuse coach any other MLB teams before Boston?

Yes. Before joining the Red Sox in 2023, Fatuse served as a hitting coordinator for the Tampa Bay Rays, helping develop several power hitters and contributing to the club’s top‑third offensive ranking in 2022.

How does the Red Sox’s OPS+ compare to the league average after the coaching change?

Since the May 1 dismissal, Boston’s team OPS+ sits at 101, just one point above the league norm of 100, indicating marginal improvement but not the leap the organization hoped for.

Are other MLB teams experiencing similar post‑coach‑dismissal player contacts?

Recent reports show that the New York Yankees and Chicago Cubs have also seen veteran players reach out to former coaches for advice, a pattern suggesting that coaching changes often create a temporary advisory vacuum.

Share this article:PostShare

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *